The problems that derail acquisitions are rarely catastrophic on their own — they're expensive because they surface late.
Deals rarely die over the issues everyone expected going in. The problems that actually derail an acquisition — or force a last-minute price renegotiation — tend to surface in the final stretch of due diligence, after both sides have already invested weeks of time and emotional commitment to closing. They're rarely catastrophic on their own. They're expensive precisely because they're discovered late.
Contracts, loans, or arrangements between the target company and entities connected to its founders or directors — disclosed nowhere in the data room until a buyer's counsel cross-references bank statements against the cap table. These raise governance questions even when the underlying transaction was legitimate, simply because it wasn't flagged upfront.
Code, designs, or content created by a founder or early contractor before the company's IP assignment agreements were formalised. If no explicit assignment exists, that IP may not actually belong to the company being acquired — a foundational problem for any deal built on the value of that IP.
Annual ROC filings, past-due GST returns, or lapsed registrations that nobody caught because the business kept operating normally in the interim. These are usually fixable, but they slow diligence at exactly the point when both sides want to move fast, and they raise questions about what else wasn't tracked.
Indemnity clauses in supplier or customer agreements signed years earlier, with exposure that was never quantified because it never triggered — until a buyer's lawyer reads the clause and asks what happens if it does.
Long-term "consultants" who function, in practice, as employees — fixed hours, exclusive engagement, ongoing supervision — without the statutory benefits or tax treatment employee status would require. This exposure often only becomes visible when a buyer's HR diligence team compares headcount against payroll records.
Each of these is fixable if found early — expensive, or deal-ending, if found in week eleven of a twelve-week diligence process.
None of these five issues are, individually, unusual for a growing business to have somewhere in its history. What makes them dangerous is discovery timing: by the time diligence reaches this depth, both sides have sunk significant cost into the deal, and a late-stage discovery forces a choice between renegotiating price under pressure, walking away after months of work, or closing anyway with unresolved risk baked in — none of which are good options.
A pre-diligence self-audit — run by the seller's own advisors before a buyer's lawyers start theirs — surfaces these same five issues on your own timeline, when you still control how and when they're disclosed and can fix or price around them proactively. This is a fraction of the cost of a deal collapsing, or being repriced, in its final weeks. For any business seriously considering a sale or fundraise in the next 12–18 months, this audit is worth doing now, not when a term sheet is already on the table.
Free — just tell us who to send it to.
Facing this exact situation?
Get a straight answer on your specific contract or compliance question — no jargon, no obligation.
Book a Free 30-Minute Call →20+ years in commercial & corporate practice — in-house at BT, Oracle and Dell before founding AstraLex.