AstraLex Insights — Issue 5

What Diligence Actually Finds, and When

If a fundraise, acquisition, or major partnership is anywhere on your horizon this year, this issue is about the audit worth running before someone else runs it on you.

Regulatory Watch

Buyer-side legal diligence in Indian mid-market M&A has become noticeably more thorough on employment classification — specifically, long-term consultants functioning as de facto employees. This is now a standard diligence line item, not an edge case, and worth reviewing proactively if your business relies on consultant arrangements.

Featured Read

Due Diligence Red Flags: The Five Issues That Kill Deals in the Final Stretch →

The five issues that most often surface late in diligence and threaten deals already months into negotiation — and why a pre-diligence self-audit is the cheapest insurance a seller can buy.

The 60-Second Tip

If you're even loosely considering a fundraise or exit in the next 12-18 months, run a lightweight version of this audit now: related-party transactions, IP assignment status, lapsed filings, contingent liabilities, and consultant classification. Twenty minutes of honest review now beats a scramble in week eleven of diligence.

Ask AstraLex

Q: We're not planning to raise or sell anytime soon — does this still apply to us?

Yes, for a simpler reason: these same five issues are exactly what create legal and financial risk even outside a deal context. Undisclosed related-party transactions and unassigned IP are problems whether or not a buyer ever looks at them.

Have a question for a future issue?

Send Us Your Question →
RS
Written by RS

20+ years in commercial & corporate practice — in-house at BT, Oracle and Dell before founding AstraLex.